Social

A review of the literature on welding aluminum alloys to steels suggests that resultant performance is heavily influenced by the formation of intermetallic phases.  Joining of aluminum to steel can result in a number of these intermetallic phases, including FeAl, Fe3Al, and Fe2Al5.   Previous observations have suggested that these phases form along the bond line of welds through interdiffusion.  As these intermetallic phases grow, their inherent low ductility compromises the integrity of the joint.  Historical work going back 20 years, confirmed by more recent studies at EWI, has suggested that when friction welding 6XXX alloys to steels, heating times in excess of 200-ms can result in extensive intermetallic formation.  Alternately, shorter (than 200-ms) cycle times appear to minimize that intermetallic formation.  EWI has recently conducted a study examining the kinetics of intermetallic formation in inertia friction welds.  In this program, welds were made at an intermediate burn-time and sectioned to assess the morphology of the resulting intermetallics.  The macro-section of the weld under consideration is shown in Figure 1, and the associated temperature profile is shown in Figure 2. 

Temperature cycles for aluminum and steel during FRW-I. Actual heating times here are on the order of 700-ms

Macrostructure of an aluminum to steel FRW-I. All deformation is on the aluminum side of the joint

 

The weld shows an effective heating time on the order of 700-ms, significantly longer the 200-ms times reported for intermetallic free joint formation.  Several locations along the bond line were then examined using scanning electron microscopy.  The analysis was done in backscatter mode to reveal changes between the relative phases between the aluminum and steel sides of the joint.  Backscatter images typically show lighter for heavier elements, and darker for the lighter ones.  Clearly, intermediate phases appear in gray tones reflecting the composition of the particular intermetallic formed.  Examples Taken at three locations are shown in Figures 3 – 5.  The micrograph of Figure 3 shows a clean interface, indicating no intermetallic.  Alternately, Figure 4 shows an area of apparent moderate intermetallic formation, while Figure 5 demonstrates a thicker intermediate layer.  Also of interest, areas that form intermetallics (Figures 4 and 5) show relatively uniform thicknesses of the intermediate phase, extending a length along the bondline.  In short, at these intermediate heating times, intermetallics can be characterized as coarsely intermittent, and of nominal uniform thickness over an extended area when they do form.  These results relate to the nature of nucleation and growth for the intermetallic itself.  It appears that intermetallic formation is a discontinuous process, but that growth is rapid once that nucleation occurs.  For areas lacking an intermetallic between the aluminum and steel, nucleation has simply not had sufficient incubation energy to occur.  In areas where this nucleation has occurred, it appears that growth is largely down the bond line rather into the bulk materials themselves.

Area of the FRW-I showing no intermetallic formation. The dark material is the steel and the light area aluminum

Area of the FRW-I with limited intermetallic formation. The intermetallic shows as an intermediate shade between the aluminum (left) and steel (right).Area of the FRW-I with extensive intermetallics.

 

Area of the FRW-I with extensive intermetallics.


One Response to “Intermetallic Formation in Aluminum to Steel Welds”

  1. Great article, Jerry. We often see friction welding applications to join tube-to-tube or tube-to-solid. With aluminum to stainless steel we prefer to work with solid bar stock and then drill the inner bore. Otherwise the extreme weld-flash that we see generated in your images would block the inner bore, and prove harder to remove than drilling through solid material. How do you handle tube applications?

Leave a Reply

Latest News

EWI’s Fundamentals of Welding Engineering Class to be offered again this June
EWI's upcoming Fundamentals of Welding Engineering class for March is sold…
Read more...
Martensite and Bainite in CGHAZ of HSLA Steel Welds
Martensite and Bainite in the CGHAZ of HSLA Steel Welds…
Read more...
Flexible Manufacturing Options for Heavy Manufacturing
Earlier this month, EWI introduced the first installment in our…
Read more...
Ohio Manufacturers’ Focus Group Set for May 27
A special focus group for Ohio manufacturers will be held on…
Read more...
Predicting Weld Distortion – An EWI Guide for Heavy Manufacturers
Weld distortion is one of the biggest challenges in heavy…
Read more...
Just Published: The Benefits of Laser-Based Inspection
EWI Principal Engineer Connie LaMorte and Business Development Director Jon Jennings were recently published…
Read more...
EWI’s Ian Harris and Matt Short to Present at TITANIUM EUROPE 2015
Novel technologies will be featured during the Welding and Allied…
Read more...
Just Published: Improved Welding of Primer-Coated Steels
EWI applications engineer Nick Kapustka and business development manager Paul Blomquist were published…
Read more...