Archives For Steve Massey

An area where EWI is expanding its knowledge is in characterizing and cataloging mechanical properties of additively manufactured metals (metals AM). The work described here was performed to obtain baseline mechanical property data for Ti 6-4 ELI weld metal buildups that were produced using hot-wire gas tungsten arc welding (GTAW-HW).

The equipment used to weld the buildup was a conventional GTAW-HW system. This work was not performed in a chamber, it was performed in open air with a trail shield added to the torch. The torch and trail shield gases used were both Argon.

jetlinetrail shield

The buildup deposited was 1.25″x7.0″x2.5″ high. The parameters used to produce the buildup were 340-amps with 260-inch/min wire feed speed. The wire used was 0.045″ diameter Ti6-4 ELI (Grade 23) wire. The buildup and the test sample locations are shown below.

buildupsample locations

The macro showed that there were no incomplete fusion or porosity type discontinuities in the sample deposit.

macro

Two tensile samples were tested from both the horizontal and vertical build direction. The test results were:

  • horizontal UTS – 137 and 133.4 ksi (125 ksi minimum required)
  • horizontal Yield strength – 124.5 and 116.1 ksi (115 ksi minimum required)
  • vertical UTS – 136.3 and 134.6 ksi
  • vertical Yield strength – 119.2 and 117.4 ksi

A chemical analysis was performed to determine if the sample could meet the following ELI requirements:

  • H – less than 0.0125%
  • N – less than 0.0301%
  • O – less than 0.13%

The sample easily met the ELI requirements with 0.0013%-H, 0.0078%-N, and 0.077%-O. (as measured using the LECO Furnace method)

Further work is required to evaluate this material in the stress relieved and beta annealed conditions.

If you are interested in learning more about additive manufacturing or the properties of materials being used in your additively manufactured parts, please feel free to contact me, Steve Massey, at 614.688.5000, or smassey@ewi.org.

You can also contact Ed Herderick at 614.688.5000, or by email at eherderi@ewi.org.

EWI hosted a welding merit badge clinic on Saturday 13 April for Boy Scouts in Columbus and the surrounding areas.  The welding merit badge is one of the newest in scouting. It is the 128th current merit badge and was released on Feb. 24, 2012.  The event was held at the EWI facility in Columbus and utilized the high bay lab in the OSU Welding Engineering side of the building. Twenty four scouts participated in the all-day event and all but one scout, who had to leave early, went home at the end of the day meeting all of the requirements to receive the merit badge.

welding_instructionwelding_instruction_2

After receiving initial safety instructions, the scouts were divided into four groups. Half of the scouts, assisted by Tim Moore, Steve Massey, Randy Dull, Doug Clark, and Aaron Shira, were given hands-on instruction on gas metal arc welding (GMAW).  Doug Clark also instructed the scouts on using the RealWeld trainer.  The other groups of scouts were instructed in welding processes (Warren Peterson), first aid and accident prevention (Rich Minshall), cutting processes (Seth Shira), and careers in welding (Dave Phillips of OSU WE dept.). These activities represent all of the skill areas required to qualify for the merit badge.   Following lunch, the groups switched so that everyone could have the opportunity to meet the requirements for the welding merit badge.

scouts and instructorwelding samples

Everyone attending had a good time and came away with a better appreciation of welding – toward the end of the day, one scout even asked how expensive weld power supplies were and where he could go to buy his own welder!

RealWeld trainerdata acquisition

Besides letting the scouts try their hand at GMAW (making welds in both butt, lap, and  t-joint configurations), they also got a chance to try out the RealWeld trainer, see demonstrations of Drop Tower Testing, Oxyfuel Cutting, Plasma Cutting, Robotic Welding, Resistance Welding, Data Acquisition, and Metallurgical Examination.

flame cuttingmechanical testing

Thanks for all who helped with this successful event!!! We look forward to hosting it again!

We would like to thank the following volunteers for graciously taking the time to support this event:

  • Rich Minshall
  • Tim Moore
  • Paul Zelenak
  • Steve Massey
  • Angi Cox
  • Seth Shira
  • Aaron Shira
  • Steve Levesque
  • Randy Dull
  • Warren Peterson
  • Doug Clark (RealWeld)
  • Leah Kohr
  • Lynn Price
  • Rebecca Gurk
  • Dave Phillips (OSU-WE)
  • Mark Matson

We just finished celebrating National Engineer’s Week 2013 here at EWI. After all, our engineers are our products, and their knowledge and abilities are great reasons to celebrate. Our Staff Association did a great job of putting together a fun week of activities to celebrate our engineers. On Monday we had Chris Cakes come to serve breakfast to the staff. Basically, they provide a pancake and sausage breakfast with a little twist. The pancakes are placed on your plate by being thrown by the griddle meister.

chris cakes engineers week 2013

I’m not sure what’s going on here, but I’m pretty sure that this is the guy behind the griddle’s first time doing this.

chris cakes engineers week 2013-2

On Tuesday we had a paper airplane competition. The paper supplied to the competitors was a “modified” 8.5″ x 11″ piece of paper. One corner of the paper was cut off to challenge the competitors a little more. The competitors had 20 minutes to construct and test their plane and then fly them for the maximum distance. A very conventional looking plane took the top prize with a very impressive flight.

paper airplane competition 1

paper airplane contest 2

Wednesday was a geeky t-shirt contest. There were some really great entries for this. You really can’t get the full impact of the equalizer shirt from a still photo. This thing had a microphone pickup and would respond to sounds and indicate levels. It was pretty cool, even for an HR guy.

heavy metal shirt

geeky t-shirt contest 1

geeky t-shirt 2

geeky t-shirt contest 3

The finale for Engineer’s Week was a pinewood happy hour on Thursday. There were a lot of original entries in to the race. Some of my favorites were the snack wagon (sponsored by hutchbags), the better mouse trap, and the Crew car. We were fortunate to get a track on loan from an associate’s former Cub Scout pack.

pinewood derby snack wagon

pinewood derby cars

Can you guess which car in the picture below belongs to the CFO?

pinewood derby cars 2

pinewood derby track

The best in show vote was a tie between the Crew car and the better mouse trap:

 

pinewood derby best of show

These were the top four racers (note the cars of three arc welding types and one HR person):

pinewood derby top four

 

The three most common metal to metal joints in a lithium-ion battery pack are foil to tab, tab to tab, and tab to bus. All three joints pose joining challenges, but of the three, welding multiple layers of foil to a tab is the most challenging. The joint is often made up of dissimilar metals, the metal thickness is mismatched, and one side (the tab) is relatively thick (e.g. 0.2 mm) while the other is made up of multiple, extremely thin, layers. The image below shows a schematic of a large format lithium-ion battery pack cell.  The foil to tab weld is needed to gather all the current collector plates (foils) inside the cell and join them to a tab which exits the cell casing and allows the cell’s energy to be transferred to an external source. There are two foil to tab welds in each cell, and hundreds of cells in a typical lithium-ion battery pack. Because of the series and parallel connections, one failure in a foil to tab joint will compromise the output of the entire pack, therefore, a robust joining process is required.

 

lithium-ion cell

Ultrasonic metal welding (UMW) was evaluated for this particular application. A schematic of the process is shown below. Ultrasonic metal welding is very capable of welding similar and dissimilar combinations of battery related materials such as copper, aluminum, and nickel. Ultrasonic vibrations, typically 20 to 40 thousand Hertz, are used to rub two parts together under pressure. The scrubbing action breaks off oxide and contamination on the surface and breaks down surface asperities creating two ‘smooth’, clean metal surfaces. Once these contact under moderate heat and pressure, a weld is formed.

UMW process schematic

The process has several advantages. Since it is a solid state process, it can be adapted to dissimilar materials combinations and avoids most concerns about formation of intermetallic compounds. It is ideally suited to welding the highly conductive materials used in batteries including plated copper. It does not require high power and weld cycles are very short, fractions of a second. It also joins multiple layers of thin materials in one operation.

Both resistance spot welding (RSW) and laser beam welding (LBW) were also considered, but lack certain attributes that make UMW a more desirable joining process for the lithium-ion battery application. RSW relies on the resistance of a material to generate heat for joining. However, the aluminum and copper foils typically used in the battery industry have extremely low resistance, in addition, aluminum alloys form a tough surface oxide layer which inhibits RSW and is further compounded by the fact that the oxide layer is present on both sides of each foil layer. UMW does not rely on bulk resistance and inherently scrubs away oxide layers as part of the process. LBW is very sensitive to gaps between material layers in the weld joint. As a general rule of thumb, the gap should be less than 10% of the material thickness. Joining a 12 µm foil would require a 1.2 µm, or less, gap which is very difficult to achieve and requires excessive fixturing. Because UMW is self-clamping, gaps are not an issue.

UWM test sample

 

A typical large format lithium-ion cell uses copper foil as the anode current collector and aluminum as the cathode current collector; therefore, both copper and aluminum have been evaluated with the UMW process. The experimental joints, as shown in the image above, were limited to similar material stacks only, meaning aluminum foils were joined to aluminum tabs and copper foils to copper tabs. The tab thicknesses were held constant at 0.005-inch. Two foil thicknesses, 12 and 25 µm, and two foil stack heights, 20 and 60 layers, were evaluated to prove feasibility and to study the effects on joint properties as the foil thickness and number of foil layers varies.

Cross Section – 20 layers of thin copper

Cross Section – 60 layers of thick aluminum

Analysis of the above cross sections provided a closer look at foil compression, foil damage and the final state of the weld joint. The samples with thinner and fewer layers of foil show an increase in foil movement directly adjacent to the weld zone.  In contrast the samples with thicker and more foil layers  showed a consolidation of the foils adjacent to the weld zone often resulting in a larger bond region. The consolidation and increase in bond region occurred because the thicker foil stacks bottomed out on the weld tool causing compression in the area adjacent to the weld zone.

Conclusions:

Joining multiple layers of thin foils to a tab in a single ultrasonic metal weld operation is feasible. The welds are achievable without fracturing the delicate foil layers. Bonding occurs at the foil to tab interface as well as at each foil to foil interface which results in a strong, highly conductive electro-mechanical joint.

IR videography shows that all joints, with the exception of the copper sample made from 60 layers of 25 µm foil, stayed under 60 ºC during the weld cycle indicating the process will not harm nearby heat sensitive components.

If you would like further information on this topic, feel free to contact Mitch Matheny at 614.688.5000, or by email at mmatheny@ewi.org.

You can also contact me, Steve Massey, at 614.688.5000, or smassey@ewi.org.

 

More and more, robotic welding is becoming a viable option for use in heavy fabrication. The sophistication and capacity of modern robot systems is suitable for large structures which require multi-pass welds. Processes used for heavy fabrication such as preheating, gas metal arc welding (GMAW), flux cored arc welding (FCAW), tandem gas metal arc welding (T-GMAW), submerged arc welding (SAW) or flame cutting can all be deployed robotically. An example of a mult-pass weld that was made with a robot is shown below.

multi-pass robot weld

One of the challenges with automating heavy fabrications is the high mix low volume nature or this type of work. To maximize the production time of the robot, an off-line programming tool should be utilized. Off-line programming, or OLP, has matured to a point where it can be used without an operator touching up program points. An example of a virtual system used in an OLP software is shown below. To succeed with OLP in high mix low volume applications OLP should be used in conjunction with robotic options that search for the weld start location and track the joint while welding. Some systems are even capable of adaptively filling a weld joint that varies in volume along the length. EWI has significant experience in creating multi-bead multi-layer adaptive welding solutions for third party equipment platforms.

off line programming cell

When considering moving to automation from a manual or semi-automatic process it is important to consider many factors. The quality of the parts that will be feeding the robotic welding system are very important and will directly influence the level of productivity possible from the system. Consistent dimensions, part fit-up, and surface condition are important factors to control on the parts that feed the robot system.  When parts are more consistent, higher production rates can be achieved. Deciding whether you want to pre-tack parts, or use hard tooling is another consideration. Using a tack fixture and presenting a tacked part in a holding fixture to the robot can be more cost effective and allow more access for the robot to perform welding.

Probably one of the most important things to consider is the selection of the personnel that will be responsible for the robotic welding in your facility. The welding is by far the most difficult portion of applying automation to heavy fabrication, the robot and system portion are easy to deal with in comparison. I would much rather have someone that knows about welding learn how to teach and operate a robot than try to teach a CNC programmer about welding. The best welding robot programmers that I know are experienced welders or have a welding background.

If you would like to discuss the possibilities of using automation in your facility, please feel free to contact me at 614.688.5000 or smassey@ewi.org.

Thanks for your interest in EWI. If you liked this post, you may also like this article on high-speed welding of aluminum.

Gas metal arc welding (GMAW) and gas tungsten arc welding (GTAW) are both regularly used for welding aluminum. GTAW is a slow process when compared to GMAW and GMAW is typically used when extremely high weld quality (with respect to porosity) is not required. GMAW works well for welding aluminum in structural, automotive, or thick section multi-pass welding, but can reach a limit at over 40-inch/min travel speed.For welding thicker aluminum structures (0.25-inch or above) a higher productivity welding process may be desired.

Tandem-GMAW, which is traditionally applied to steel for higher productivity, can also successfully be applied to aluminum. Work has been performed at EWI to demonstrate fillet welds on 0.25-inch thick 6061 aluminum plates in t-joint and lap configurations. The electrodes used for these demonstrations were 3/64-inch diameter ER-5356 and the shielding gas was 100% Argon. Welding speeds of 60-inch/minute were achieved in both joint configurations. In both cases, the process was stable and minimal spatter was ejected from the weld pool. The stability of the process at 60-inch/min suggests that higher travel speeds could be possible.

Figure 1 shows the fillet weld in the t-joint configuration. Note the consistency of the weld toes. Figure 2 shows a macro of the same weld; which indicates ample fusion at the weld root.

tandem-gmaw aluminum t-joint

Figure 1.  0.25-inch fillet weld in t-joint at 60-inch/min travel speed

tandem-gmaw aluminum t-joint macro

Figure 2.  Macro of fillet weld in t-joint showing good fusion profile at the weld root

Figure 3 shows the fillet weld in the lap joint configuration, which also exhibits consistency at the weld toes. The fusion at the weld root for this weld, shown in Figure 4, is also ample.

tandem-gmaw aluminum lap joint

Figure 3.  Fillet weld in lap joint configuration

tandem-gmaw aluminum lap macro

Figure 4. Macro of fillet weld in lap joint showing good fusion profile at the weld root

If you are currently welding aluminum or other metals with GMAW and desire a productivity increase, tandem-GMAW may be an option for you. EWI has acquired expertise on many ways to apply tandem-GMAW and has an in-depth understanding of the interaction of the variables involved. To find out if tandem-GMAW is for you, or if you would like to speak to one of our experts on tandem-GMAW, please contact Adam Uziel at 614.688.5000 or auziel@ewi.org. You can also contact me, Steve Massey, at smassey@ewi.org.

Thanks for your interest in EWI.

Lightweighting is an important focus for design folks in the automotive and aerospace worlds. Reducing the weight of a vehicle helps to improve fuel economy and reducing the weight of an airplane additionally enables more cargo to be carried. Magnesium-Aluminum-Zinc (Mg-Al-Zn) alloys have the highest strength to weight ratios of structural metals. AZ31B (Mg-3Al-1Zn) is 35-percent less dense than aluminum, but has 89-percent of the strength of 6061-T6 aluminum.

One of the challenges when trying to join Mg is that it rapidly oxidizes at temperatures above 400-degrees Celcius as the image below shows.

metallic moss

Through our unique soldering approach, EWI has been able to join Mg to both aluminum and steel with very limited oxidation.

Shown below are cross sections of a Mg to steel joint. The first one is shown with no magnification and the second shows the bond line at 50x magnification.

mg to steel at 50x magnification

Here are the cross sections of a Mg to Al joint. The first one is shown with no magnification and the second shows the bond line at 50x magnification.

Mg to Al no magnificationMg to Al at 50x magnification

If you would like more information on joining solutions for lightweighting, or dissimilar metals joining, please contact Kirk Cooper of the EWI Materials Group.

You can reach Kirk at 614.688.5000 or kcooper@ewi.org.

You can also contact me, Steve Massey, at smassey@ewi.org.

Thanks for your interest in EWI.

Well folks, Movember is upon us. Some of you call this no-shave November and use it as an excuse to grow a beard or a goatee or something like that. It is officially called Movember and growing a sweet moustache is the proper way to raise awareness and money for men’s health issues. Prostate cancer research is a primary benefactor of the funds raised during Movember.

EWI is back fo’ Mo’ in 2012!

Last year, the 45 member team from EWI raised $2525 for men’s health issues. One member raised over $1000 all by himself! Last year there was a lot of excitement around Movember at EWI. We even had Monica Day from NBC4 visit us to kick off the event.

Check out the TV spot that originally aired on Channel 4 last year:

Maybe this year, once everybody is safe from Hurricane Sandy – aka Frankenstorm, we could get Jen Carfagno to stop by!

Our goal this year is to raise $4000 for research of men’s health issues.

If you would like to join our team, please visit this link: Join the Team to grow a ‘stache and help raise money for the cause.

If you would like to donate, please visit this link: Donate to the Team

Thanks for your support!

In this video published by The American Ceramic Society, Ed talks about the development and testing that EWI has been working on related to joining silicon carbide (SiC) ceramic matrix composites for use in nuclear reactors.

silicon carbide tube

Please see the video posted on ceramics.org:

Video of Ed Herderick talking SiC joining

 

If you would like more information related to this topic, please contact Ed Herderick.  You can reach him at 614.688.5000 or eherderick@ewi.org

You can also contact me (Steve Massey) at smassey@ewi.org. Please also see the other blogs introducing the members of the Materials team:

This week the “Meet the Team” series introduces George Ritter of the EWI Materials group. George specializes in the areas of adhesives and plastics.  George has spent over 30 years in industrial research environments, with much of that time spent on structural adhesives bonding applications. Please feel free to contact George if you have any questions related to EWI or materials related issues. You can reach him at 614.688.5000 or gritter@ewi.org.

george_ritter

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Technical Expertise

George specializes in adhesives bonding systems and processes.  His work includes adhesives applications for metals and plastics in automotive, aerospace, marine, general industrial, electronics, and medical fields.  His current work includes investigations of composites-to-metals bonding, laser-weldbonded aluminum structure, bonding of dissimilar metals and ceramics for lightweight structures and armor, medical bonding of plastics and metals, and selection of specific adhesives for specific end uses.  He has had industrial experience in the development and marketing of adhesives for automotive, flexible packaging, nonwoven disposables, woodworking, and polymer composites using epoxy, urethane, hotmelt, and waterborne adhesives.

Background and Project Experience

George is a frequently invited speaker and teacher at industrial symposia.  He holds several U.S. patents in areas of ceramics, high performance materials, and adhesive materials.  His most recent patent (2005) is in the field of laser weldbonded aluminum aircraft structure.  In November 2005, he was a co-recipient of the U.S. Department of Defense Manufacturing Technology Achievement Award for his work in the development of a completely adhesive-bonded composite-to-steel joint for the Navy DD-X Surface Combatant program.

Education

B.S.      Chemistry, Summa cum Laude, Baldwin-Wallace College

M.S.     Chemistry, Case Western Reserve University

Ph.D.    Chemistry, Case Western Reserve University

Professional Affiliations

American Chemical Society

Adhesion Society

SAMPE

You can also contact me (Steve Massey) at smassey@ewi.org. Please also see the other blogs introducing the members of the Materials team:

Kirk Cooper

Jose Ramirez

Ed Herderick

Morgan Gallagher